<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy, Climate Change and CFLs, Oh My!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.teamearth.com/2010/03/08/more-info-cfls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.teamearth.com/2010/03/08/more-info-cfls/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail Thomas</title>
		<link>http://blog.teamearth.com/2010/03/08/more-info-cfls/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teamearth.com/?p=177#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Are LED&#039;s more efficient than CFL&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are LED&#8217;s more efficient than CFL&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ciska Cassa</title>
		<link>http://blog.teamearth.com/2010/03/08/more-info-cfls/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciska Cassa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teamearth.com/?p=177#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Sorry but those energy saving light-bulbs are way expensive and then they break down within a month or two and they are so full of poisonous mercury you can&#039;t dispose of them normally - you have to take them to a special recycling outlet that is almost impossible to get to without a car. 
They just don&#039;t make that much sense environmentally taking those factors into consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but those energy saving light-bulbs are way expensive and then they break down within a month or two and they are so full of poisonous mercury you can&#8217;t dispose of them normally &#8211; you have to take them to a special recycling outlet that is almost impossible to get to without a car.<br />
They just don&#8217;t make that much sense environmentally taking those factors into consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando Puerta</title>
		<link>http://blog.teamearth.com/2010/03/08/more-info-cfls/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando Puerta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teamearth.com/?p=177#comment-16</guid>
		<description>The CFL&#039;s save 80% energy making it a good reason to think about the environment, and the LED technology save more that 95% Energy with a special feature, it can last more than 40.000 hours, so this is even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CFL&#8217;s save 80% energy making it a good reason to think about the environment, and the LED technology save more that 95% Energy with a special feature, it can last more than 40.000 hours, so this is even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandro Buss</title>
		<link>http://blog.teamearth.com/2010/03/08/more-info-cfls/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandro Buss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teamearth.com/?p=177#comment-14</guid>
		<description>In fact, there are LED lamps adaptable to the regular sockets in the ceiling that are even more efficient and durable that the CFLs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, there are LED lamps adaptable to the regular sockets in the ceiling that are even more efficient and durable that the CFLs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

